fort monroe

ear Area Security

Transition

Operations

Shaping

Operation

Convention sl

US Dominance

Unc e r tainty

Offensive

Defensive... Counterattack

LJhJjn SUppiffi
La 2 J da /‘ship
WLJ La LjpdL 1
A J J J 3J JJ C a3/ C £)5J J }||
JJ5

LLradapy Li

rjrjryr j 1 ]

n

PTSfeu u

r*

Security

perations

Shaping J
Operations

SPT

Sustaining Operations

riild^hu d

Conventional Onerations

Internal Security

Local, Regional, National &
Secret Police

Para-military Organizations
Civilian Mobilization
Regional Threats

Tr ansition Onerations

Armored and Mechanized Forces

Transition

Engineers

Pre-positioned - logistics
Hardened C2
Deception

Protecting Regional Gains
Long Range Artillery and Rockets . . ......

99 Armored and Mechanized

Fixed and Rotary Wing Air ForcesForces
UAVs and Night Vision Regional Police

Medium Range Missiles Rotary Wing Air Forces

Coastal Navy HUMINT/SOF

HUMINT/SOF Access Denial

Access Denial

onventibnal

erat

Preservation

Camouflage, Concealment,
Cover Deception and Denial

Redundant C2

Access Denial

Counter - precision, ISR &
mobility.

IO

Air and Missile Defenses

Theater Ballistic Missiles

Chemical/ Biological
Weapons

HUS'ljNT/SCf.VsiW!

Controlling the Conflict
Environment

All Elements of National
Power

Precision

Strike

Mol

/

bile/ Mech*
Commercial Ti

Information Operations: EW, cyber-
attack, protection and security

Diplomatic initiatives

Strategic

Economic leverage
Terrorist attacks
Precision strike - TBM
Weapons of Mass Effects

anized Reserves
echnical ISR

C fj slJ] IfJJ) cj Op Uffji/DfllJJ

n

Urban sett in
platfoijm b d
maneuver

More m

Human issue

Increased Go

With increas
urban/complex I

capaDin

I i : ti I

inq their

imari

or tribe

m e rg enc e of a “Warrio r Cla ss” w h ose de sire |p

fight and kilj exceeds their desire to Live

In the fight for the "long haul"

| Unconstrained ROE vs. US constrained ROE

Increasingly includes criminal & terrorist elements

m FEE

U S 'f'dchsricul VuJu 9

PfadsJOfj/fjjghJy w&wposJS

Jiufjf’u vb d KP Pi uni bio ue
Air/ Ar kill Bry doJivorod J-l. PPi

DPJCMfrGSM

A'PGPi/PxPG

-fzjfjdz/n bJbAf
Pi] si BO

PJ Pi Dj.

( 'me

Plump

Laujsjj WaisJpo/Jss

Las as

if

'-1PM

Oihaif' 'fhi'Ejzi'bs

GPP J a in in in y
Jutapfatad £W .
Physical Attack

Atiacli
o f C2

VLilnprcibilitiPD palpal} bpyuml b DinbdfAbiJ s

At tiffing M1A2 Qjl Cion

t 353#Bf7] vuJfj orabuitjon

UnOOOO

Caplolt com plan on vlr on in an t

Proa or v a combat povvor whllo
j pplna tho on o my 'a will and

g apabiflty to tight

Can a a eaa Haitian

Cl oiitrallao to dm ologl cal
ov or match

Dony aaaoc:

Conventional,

briventiona
I

and avoid loam a . , r .

Pour or no or D o or 'an on

Jon- 1 inear Operations
OPTEMPO

Threat Identification

Threat RSTA

Terrorism
Sustainment

Con vontionad aaymmotrle and adapfj
doth off anal v a and dofonalv
Dlaporaod , docontrallaod Cl dlatrlbct |
Control to/npo and con flict on vlronn\
Int or diet v\PODc JCPOD

omplex/Urba n Terrain

Vectors
Humanism

information Operation
Threat CCD

mwm

ZJ

PJ1A2 22P ODBf'jiJvfJ'jJ 2/JVJ/ofJ/na/ji j-Jj ci/jJj cihi:z

.

A wider spectrum of operations, increased
threat technological capability and
unpredictability leading to a more ilex and

In association with an Adaptive and Adoptive
Threat

*A Challenge to independent maneuver

* Complex and difficult maneuver support
requirements

* Enhances necessity for Combined Arms Operations

* Extremely lethal close combat environment

* Degradation of U.S. technological superiority

* Changed target sets

* Challenges U.S. nrefer~’ed method of attack... long
range precision